Thursday, July 7, 2011
There are three main choices when it comes to buying a new server: tower, rack, or blade. Here are some of the pros and cons about each kind of server, as well as some of my experiences with each one.
1. Tower servers
As implied, tower servers are probably found more often in smaller environments than anywhere else, although you might find them in point solutions in larger places.
Tower servers are generally on the lower end price-wise, although they can expand pretty decently and become really expensive.
Tower servers take up a lot of space and require individual monitors, keyboards, and mice or a keyboard, video, mouse (KVM) switch that allows them to be managed with a single set of equipment. In addition, cabling can be no fun, especially if you have a lot of network adapters and other I/O needs. You’ll have cables everywhere.
I don’t buy a lot of tower servers these days, but they still have a place. My most recent tower server purchase was to serve as my backup system running Microsoft Data Protection Manager 2010.
2. Rack servers
Rack servers are extremely common and make their home inside these racks along with other critical data center equipment such as backup batteries, switches, and storage arrays. Rack servers make it easy to keep things neat and orderly since most racks include cable management of some kind. However, rack servers don’t really simplify the cabling morass since you still need a lot of cabling to make everything work — it’s just neater. I once worked in a data center in which I had to deploy 42 2U Dell servers into three racks. Each server had to have dual power cables, keyboard, video, and mouse cables and six (yes, six) network cables (six colors with each color denoting a specific network). It was a tough task to keep the cabling under control, to put it mildly. Because everything was racked, there was built-in cable management that made this easier.
Like tower servers, rack servers often need KVM capability in order to be managed, although some organizations simply push a monitor cart around and connect to video and USB ports on the front of the server so that they don’t need to worry about KVM.
Rack servers are very expandable; some include 12 or more disks right in the chassis and support for four or more processors, each with multiple cores. In addition, many rack servers support large amounts of RAM, so these devices can be computing powerhouses.
3. Blade servers
There is still some truth to the fact that blade servers have expansion challenges when compared to the tower and rack-based options. For example, most tower servers have pretty significant expansion options when it comes to PCI/PCI Express slots and more disk drives. Many blade servers are limited to two to four internal hard drives, although organizations that use blade servers are likely to have shared storage of some kind backing the blade system.
Further, when it comes to I/O expansion options, blade servers are a bit limited by their lack of expansion slots. Some blade servers boast PCI or PCI Express expansion slots, but for most blade servers, expansion is achieved through the use of specially designed expansion cards. In my case, the Dell M600 and M610 blades have three mezzanines. The first mezzanine consists of dual Gigabit Ethernet adapters. The remaining mezzanines are populated based on organizational need. In my case, our blades have a second set of Gigabit Ethernet adapters housed in the second mezzanine and Fibre Channel adapters in the third. If necessary, I could also choose to use mezzanine cards with four ports in some configurations. So, although the blade server doesn’t have quite the I/O selection of other server form factors, it’s no slouch, either.
When raw computing power and server density is the key drive, blade servers meet the need. For example, in my environment, I have a 10U Dell M1000e blade chassis that can support up to 16 servers. So, each server uses the equivalent of 0.625U of rack space. On top of that, the blade chassis holds four gigabit Ethernet switches and two Fibre Channel switches, so there is additional rack space savings since I don’t need to rack mount these devices to support different connectivity options. In addition, the blade chassis has a built-in KVM switch so I don’t need to buy a third party and cable it up.
Speaking of cabling, a blade environment generally has much less of it than tower or rack environments since a lot of the connectivity is handled internally. You’ll end up with a neater server room as a result.
Another point is adding a new server consists of simply sliding it into an available slot in the chassis. There is no need to rack a new server and deal with a bunch of new cabling. This small size makes heat dissipation a challenge. Blade chassis can put out a lot of heat.
From a cost perspective, blade servers require some initial infrastructure, such as the chassis, so the upfront cost is often higher than for servers of other types.
Bottom line
If you need one or two servers, a tower solution probably makes sense. If you need three to 24 servers or massive scalability, then rack servers are for you. When you go need more than 24 servers, I advise you to consider a blade solution to meet your data center needs.Original Source
July 6, 2011, 5:37 AM PDT
Server rack cable Management, Rack Cable Management, Rack Cable Management solution, Server rack cable Management suppliers, Rack Cable Management solution in Bangalore, Rack Cable Management in India.
ReplyDeleteCable management, Cable Organizer, Network Cable management, HCable Management, cable management rack, cable Management Solutions, cable management, cable management systems, Network Cable management, rack cable management are designed to meet the High density application.
ReplyDeleteCable Management, network cabling services, rack management system, Cable Runways, vertical rack cable management, Horizontal cable management suppliers, rack cable management manufacturers, and serverack cable rack management in Bangalore.
ReplyDeleteRacks Manufacturers in Bangalore:
ReplyDeleteYou may know the all type of racks manufacturers
Like : Mobile Compactors Racks, Heavy Duty Racks, Cable Tray Manufacturer , Heavy Duty Shelving Racks , Pallets Racks manufactures and all
but Where you will get this products easily with lower cost and the best quality ? That will provide The one and only industry: metalimpacts
Just login to http://www.metalimpacts.in
India's leading manufacturers and suppliers of heavy duty racks, heavy duty pallet rack, heavy duty racking and shelving. Contact us for heavy duty racks manufacturer with best quality.
ReplyDeleteIndia's leading manufacturers and suppliers of rack, storage solution, storage racks. Contact us storage rack and rack manufacturers with best quality.
ReplyDeleteI go through your website it’s very good and having good information about the Heavy duty Racking systems Manufacturers, and we are also having similar website you can visit us.
ReplyDeleteHeavy duty Racking systems Manufacturers
Server rack cable Management, network server rack, Rack Cable Management, Rack Cable Management solution,Rack Cable Management solution in Bangalore
ReplyDeleteCable management Solutions designed for High density Network Cables. Variety of Cable Management Racks that provides best Network Cable Solutions in India
ReplyDeleteTK-1602R 16-port Stackable KVM Transition lets you control a number of Computers with just one single keyboard, monitor and mouse. Transferring between Computers with a simple click of the option! Get rid of the trouble associated with cable television changing and save money and place with TK-1602R. Designed with easy enlargement planned, you possibly can compare to 16 devices together to regulate utmost associated with 256 Computers.
ReplyDeleteFor more info: http://www.trendnet.com.au/index.php/kvm/rack-mount-kvm.html